MercatIQ home

How teams decide what to buy

Criteria, comparisons, and scoring methods for teams evaluating software, vendors, and suppliers.

Aug 19, 2026

·

Structured buying

Nine steps that turn scattered research into a scored comparison your team can defend, from defining scope to documenting the decision.

Three approaches compared as bars: gut feel is shortest, spreadsheet is longer, scored comparison runs full length and is highlighted in teal.

Aug 19, 2026

·

Structured buying

Nine steps that turn scattered research into a scored comparison your team can defend, from defining scope to documenting the decision.

Three approaches compared as bars: gut feel is shortest, spreadsheet is longer, scored comparison runs full length and is highlighted in teal.

Read all articles

Aug 26, 2026

·

Structured buying

Most vendor comparisons get assembled from browser tabs, a spreadsheet and a chat window. Each is good at part of the job and none of them is good at the decision.

Three scored bars labelled open tabs, chat answer and scored comparison, with scored comparison scoring highest.

Aug 26, 2026

·

Team alignment

The analysis is the easy half. Getting six people from four departments to accept the same conclusion is where vendor decisions actually break down.

Three scored bars labelled loudest opinion, another meeting and agreed criteria, with agreed criteria scoring highest.

Aug 25, 2026

·

Why decisions stall

Buying groups spend months comparing options and still regret the purchase. The data says the failure happens earlier than anyone looks.

Three scored bars labelled more sources, more time and clear criteria, with clear criteria scoring highest.

Not the decision you are trying to make?

Tell us what you are evaluating. We will show you how MercatIQ builds the criteria, runs the research, and scores the options.